| |
MARRIAGE, DIVORCE, & REMARRIAGE
It is sad to witness Christians who will attempt to twist
biblical teachings for the purpose of pursuing an
unjustified
divorce or separation. Hopefully, the following biblical resources will
dissuade any and all of such behavior. Neither is it moral to
hold views of marriage, divorce, or
remarriage, under the guise of upholding religious tradition or
cultural morality, which are at odds with careful Scriptural
exegesis and comprehensive scholarship. Such efforts neither
build sound marriages or help reduce divorce rates, inside or
outside the church.
Having personally experienced the tragedy of divorce, I have
spent the past 20+ years reading and evaluating articles and books
on the subject of marriage, divorce, and remarriage. The
comprehensive and scholarly work of Dr. David Instone-Brewer as well as
the treatment,
Divorce and Re-Marriage: Recovering the Biblical View by
William F. Luck, Sr., stand out as exceptional. Professor
Luck's work is best suited for the average Christians.
Note: Despite his fine analysis on the institution of
marriage, Professor Luck fails to grasp Paul's teachings regarding
the believer's New Creation standing. The last two chapters on
the Ten Commandments and the use of OT law can be omitted without
doing harm to the preceding twenty chapters. There is a simple
and obvious reason why Paul imported a Jewish ethical framework into
the seaport city of Corinth, "Brothers, I could not address you
as spiritual but as worldly--mere infants in Christ." The
pagan Corinthians were not benefactors of Hebrew cultural/ethical
traditions, nor had they progressed very far in knowledge, faith,
truth, or love. Paul applies God's Edenic pattern as the
starting point for a solution. Further,
Luck's treatment of polygyny in Chapter 15 fails on a number of levels.
For a comprehensive and scholarly work on the subject of polygamy, see Richard Davidson's
Polygamy in the Old Testament.
Much
damage has befallen the Church due to erroneous teaching on the
subjects of marriage, divorce, remarriage, and
more foundationally Creation-based sexuality.
For the most
part, both ancient and modern churches have failed to provide individuals,
young and older, with the tools
to create healthy marriages.
Typically,
Christians often avoid serious study on these subjects unless
pastoral duties force them to truly wrestle with the issues or their own marriages
fall apart and end in divorce. Many well-meaning,
conservative Christians, including their leaders, believe themselves
immune to the possibility of divorce.
Incorrect
and erroneous views
"can be traced through the Church Fathers, Church canon law, and the
writings of the Reformers. It was developed in two different
directions in the Catholic and Reformed churches, one moving towards
easier annulment and the other towards easier divorce."
Many conservative, fundamental, and dispensational churches hold the unscriptural
view of "No divorce, No remarriage, except with death of the
spouse." Based on violations of basic principles of sound biblical interpretation, they
erroneously believe their view represents the moral ethics advocated by
Jesus and the Apostles. The end result has been nothing short of
devastating upon individuals, families, as well as the Church.
Below are
additional articles which explore and discuss these subjects in more
detail.
-
Dr. David Instone-Brewer
is a Baptist minister and Research Fellow of Tyndale House,
Cambridge, and member of the Divinity Faculty at University of
Cambridge, UK. His scholarly works merit careful study.
"The message of the NT is that divorce is allowed but should be avoided
whenever possible. Divorce is allowed only on the grounds of broken
marriage vows, and the decision to divorce can be made only by the injured
party. A believer should never break the marriage vow, and should try
to forgive a repentant partner who has done so. If divorce does
happen, remarriage is permitted. All this would be obvious to a
first-century believer, but the meaning of the text was obscured at a very
early date due to ignorance about the Jewish background after 70 C.E.
"The [early church] Fathers were ignorant of the Jewish
background to Jesus' divorce debate with the Pharisees. As a result, they
were almost universal in their teaching that adultery was the only ground for
separation and that remarriage could take place only after the death of a former
spouse. They gradually developed the idea that marriage is indissoluble,
and the Catholic Church carried on this view right up to the present, though it
has developed a flexible, easy approach to annulment.
"The
Reformers rejected indissolubility as a doctrine that was based on the
Vulgate translation "sacramentum"
in Ephesians 5:32. They therefore allowed remarriage after a divorce
for adultery or desertion by an unbeliever. They had a variety of ways
to show that such divorces do not involve breaking up a marriage.
"The Church should now be humble and admit that a great mistake has been
made. Too many generations of husbands and wives have been forced to
remain with their abusing or neglectful partners and have not been allowed
to divorce even after suffering repeated unfaithfulness. The Church
should not continue in a false teaching because Church tradition should not
be regarded as superior to the teaching of Jesus and Paul." DIB
| |
- SEATED
- ASCENDED
- RAISED
- BURIED
- CRUCIFIED
General &
Special Revelation
Christian Agnosticism
|