DR. JAMES I. PACKER

Rediscovering Holiness

Miles J. Stanford


Have you ever wondered why (I know you have) most Doctors of Theology, both Covenant and Dispensational, are seemingly blind to the growth truths that are so plain to you? And why is it that they talk grace, while teaching law? The intent of this Polemic Paper is to supply the doctrinal explanation and answer to this deadly anomaly.

DR. JAMES 1. PACKER is probably the best known and most popular Covenant theologian of the day. He is professor at Regent College, in Vancouver, British Columbia. Regent was originally founded by the Plymouth Brethren--today it is a Neo-Evangelical/Covenant stronghold.

Dr. Packer is also a senior editor, Visiting Scholar, and Institute Fellow for the Neo-Evangelical Christianity Today. His associations and preferences go even further astray. He is one of the signers of the disastrous document titled "Evangelicals & Catholics Together." He is a member of the Steering Committee of COR ("Coalition on Revival") , a Reconstruction-Dominion-Theonomy organization.

All of this makes it only natural for him to be a member of the Board of Reference of Richard J. Foster's Renovaré [to make new, spiritually] movement. This is a Quaker-spawned organization promoting such drastic techniques as guided imagery, visualization, astral projection, Zen meditation, and Jungian psychology.

Our primary concern here is to look into Dr. Packer's book titled Rediscovering Holiness (Servant Books, Ann Arbor, 1992, 276 pages). Like all Covenant theologians, being Puritan--and law-oriented, the author is a facile writer of error, especially in the realm of the Christian life. In this book he cites several contemporary authors who also center upon his basic theme, law-based discipline:

Richard J. Foster, in his Celebration of Discipline (1987), explored twelve disciplines in three groups: the inward disciplines of meditation, prayer, fasting, and study; the outward disciplines of simplicity, solitude, submission, and service; and the corporate disciplines of confession (meaning accountability), worship, guidance, and celebration (p. 113).

Dr. Foster is presently a faculty member of the charismatic Azuza Bible College. The Navigators have sponsored him several times for family conferences, held at Glen Eyrie. His drastic and dangerous teachings are critiqued in our Polemic Paper titled Navigators Sans Compass.

More recent exponents of the theme of discipline seem to be standing on Foster's shoulders. Donald S. Whitney's Spiritual Disciplines For the Christian Life (1991) works over more than half of Foster's topics, and adds stewardship and journaling to the list (p. 114).

Dr. Whitney's book is published by NavPress, and is totally Covenant law teaching. The Foreword was written by none other than Dr. J.I. Packer, in which he wrote:

Don Whitney's spiritual feet are blessedly cemented in the wisdom of the Bible, as spelled out by the Puritan and older evangelical masters [how about Paul?], and he plots the path of discipline with a sure touch. The foundations he lays are evangelical, not legalistic. In other words, he calls us to pursue Godliness through practicing the disciplines out of gratitude for the grace that has saved us, not as self-justifying or self-advancing effort.

If, then, as a Christian you want to be really real with your God, moving beyond the stage of playing games with yourself and Him, this book provides practical help. A century and a half ago the Scottish professor "Rabbi" Dundan sent his students off to read John Owen, the Puritan, on indwelling sin with the admonition, "But gentlemen, prepare for the knife." As I pass you over to Don Whitney, I would say to you, "Now friend, prepare for the workout" (pp. 7.8.).

Dr. Whitney, being Covenant, does not understand that the Lord Jesus lived His life--and lives that life in the Christian--by the nature of His being, not the "workout" of regulatory discipline and habits.

The Lord Jesus not only expects these Disciplines of us, He modeled them for us. He applied His heart to discipline. He disciplined Himself for the purpose of Godliness. And if we are going to be Christlike, we must live as Christ lived (p. 18).

Discipline without direction is drudgery. But the Spiritual Disciplines are never drudgery as long as we practice them with the goal of Godliness in mind. If your picture of a disciplined Christian is one of a grim, tight-lipped, joyless half-robot, then you've missed the point. Jesus was the most disciplined Man who ever lived and yet the most joyful and passionately alive. He is our example of discipline. Let us follow Him to joy through the Spiritual Disciplines (p. 22).

Dr. Packer, in his book under review here, mentions another writer of discipline:

Elisabeth Elliot, in Discipline: the Glad Surrender (1982), deals with the discipline of the body, the mind, place (meaning status) , time, possessions, work, and feelings (p. 114).

Then he moves on to yet another disciplinarian:

Dallas Willard, in The Spirit of the Disciplines (1988), pursues the thought that we will become like Christ if we live as he did, maintaining a rhythm of solitude and silence, prayer, simple and sacrificial living, meditation on Scripture, and service to others (p. 114).

Dr. Willard is a Southern Baptist minister, and professor and past director of the School of Philosophy at the University of Southern California. He writes:

By focusing on the whole of Jesus' life and the lives of many who have best succeeded in following Him, I will outline a psychological and theologically sound, testable way to meet grace and fully conform to Him (p. 10).

Many Christians could not help but see that spiritual growth and vitality stem from what we actually do with our lives, from the habits we form, and from the character that results (emphasis ours) (p. 20).

The fact that He was human just as we are ensures that we must likewise share the disciplines with Him--not because He was sinful and in need of redemption, as we are, but because He had a body as we do. His understanding with His Father was "sacrifice and offering Thou hast not desired, but a body hast Thou prepared for Me" (Heb. 10:5). He shared the human frame, and as for all human beings, His body was the focal point of His life (p. 29).

Dr. Packer recommends a fourth example of discipline, in a book by the present pastor of my first church home (1941-1945)--College Church, in Wheaton:

Dr. R. Kent Hughes, once Richard Foster's colleague, in Disciplines of a Godly Man (1991) reviews 16 Disciplines for men under the headings: purity, marriage, fatherhood, friendship, mind, devotion, prayer, worship, integrity, tongue, work, church, leadership, giving, witness, and ministry. In his survey of discipline he lays on the male conscience "over 100 dos" (p. 114).

There will be further comment on Dr. Hughes' writing, below.

The Covenant theologian fails to realize that the Christian life is lived by the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus--the life of Christ. Hence Dr. Packer seeks to regulate and discipline the Christian life by the law as his "rule of life"--with the Spirit's help.

The Spirit of Christ will neither "help" nor "enable" one to keep the law unto which he has died (Gal. 2:19). He allows the believer to be put under, or put himself under the law in order to subsequently bring him down to the "Oh, wretched man" condition, so that he may turn from his law-effort and say, "I thank God through Jesus Christ" (Rom. 7:24,25). His ministry to the believer is to give him "the things of Christ," not the law.

Now to see what Dr. Packer really means by Rediscovering Holiness. We shall see that the author thoroughly "out-laws" the above-mentioned disciplinarians:

LAW -- In its application to believers, the word "holy" implies both devotion and assimilation: devotion, in the sense of living a life of service to God; assimilation, in the sense of imitating, conforming to, and becoming like the God one serves. For the Christian, this means taking God's moral law as our rule and God's incarnate Son as our model (p. 19).

Spirituality without ethics corrupts itself by becoming morally insensitive and antinomian, more concerned to realize God's presence than to keep His law (p. 92).

The rule of holiness is God's revealed law (p. 49).

There is that antinomian idiocy that rattles on about love and liberty, forgetting that the God-given law remains the standard of the God-honoring life (p. 95).

THE ANSWER -- Israel's law was abrogated at Calvary. It will be reinaugurated as the law of the theocratic millennial Kingdom. To enter into a relationship with the law during this age of grace--the dispensation of the Church--results in spiritual blindness of the mind:

"But their minds were blinded; for until this day remaineth the same veil untaken away in the reading of the Old Testament; which veil is taken away in Christ. But even unto this day, when Moses is read, the veil is upon their heart" (2 Cor. 3:14,15).

Take up the things of Israel, and that is what you get. Taking the law into the life of the Christian causes spiritual blindness in two primary areas--that of Grace, and that of the Law itself. Law is applied to Grace, and Grace is applied to Law--thereby obliterating both:

"And if by grace, then it is no more works [law]; otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace; otherwise work is no more work" (Rom. 11:6).

(1)   First, the law-blindness concerning grace.  The legalist, especially the Covenantist, makes a great show of grace for justification. But by that he does not mean pure grace--grace alone. His law-blindness causes him to be in terror of pure grace--actually having a hatred of it. To him, sheer grace is antinomianism (lawlessness), and "easy-believism." His Lordship Salvation adds "dos" and "conditions" to justification--hence it is no more of grace.

But the Word of Truth simply says, "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved" (Acts 16:31).

As for sanctification of the believer in his life and walk, the law-blinded place him under the unauthorized law as a "rule of life," adding grace via the Spirit's "help" for them to keep the law--for which He never helps, and they never accomplish. Thus grace is no more grace. To watch their Romans Seven struggles and battles, and listen to their moans and groans, it is quite evident that they are receiving no "help" from that Quarter!

The glorified Lord Jesus Christ's message to His Bride via Paul, whether for justification or sanctification, is all of grace, pure and simple:

"Nevertheless, when it shall turn to the Lord, the veil [blindness] shall be taken away. Now the Lord is that Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty" (2 Cor. 3:16).

The Spirit of Christ does not minister the law to a member of the heavenly Body of Christ, nor does He help him keep it:

"For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death" (Rom. 8:2).

"But we all, with unveiled face beholding as in a mirror [the Word] the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory [growth], even as by the Spirit of the Lord" (2 Cor. 3:18).

It is not a matter of "imitating," or "conforming," or "being like," etc., but rather a restful dependence upon the Spirit of Christ for the liberty of spiritual growth, both as to the negative, and the positive:

"And this I say then, Walk in the Spirit [dependent], and ye shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh" (Gal. 5:16).

(2)   Second, the law also blinds the law-oriented Christian concerning itself. He does not realize that the law ministers Calvary death:

" ... not of the letter [law], but of the spirit; for the letter killeth, but the Spirit giveth life. But if the ministration of death written and engraved in stones, was glorious ... how shall not the ministration of the Spirit ["of life in Christ Jesus"] be more glorious?" (2 Cor. 3:6-8).

"But we are delivered from the law, having died [on the Cross] to that in which we were held, that we should serve in newness of spirit and not in the oldness of the letter" (Rom. 7:6).

"For I, through the law, am dead to the law, that I might live unto God." "For I have been crucified with Christ" (Gal. 2:19,20).

The law-bound believer is blinded to the fact that the penalty of the broken law has been fulfilled and satisfied by its condemnation of him to the death of the Cross, thereby freeing him for the liberty of grace. Rather, he seeks to use the law as a regulator and developer of his Christian life.

Moreover, the law binds him to the earth, blinding him to his position in heaven. He is therefore mainly limited to the Jewish realm of the OT, the Synoptics, and the earthly Kingdom to come. He adulterates grace by adultery with the law--the struggles of the law deprive him of the restful reckoning of grace.

Not blinding, but blinded brilliance describes the abilities of most Christian leaders today--all the way from Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia to Dallas Theological Seminary and beyond. From in between (Illinois) we take Dr. R. Kent Hughes as an example:

Longtime senior pastor of prestigious College Church (across the street from Wheaton College campus), Dr. Hughes earned his M.Div. at Talbot Theological Seminary, his D.Min. at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, and his D.D. at Biola University.

Over and above a number of books, he has written nine volumes in the Preaching the Word commentary series--all based upon Covenant theology. It is noteworthy to note how these Covenantists make their legality become "legal." In his Discipline of a Godly Man, Dr. Hughes writes:

There is a universe of difference between the motivation behind legalism and discipline. Legalism says, "I will do this thing to gain merit with God," while discipline says, "I will do this because I love God and want to please Him." Legalism is man-centered; discipline is God-centered (p.26).

Motivational manipulation. Whether doing it for self, or for God, it is still law--and neither pleases the Father of the Bride!

One of Dr. Hughes' books is titled Disciplines of Grace (Crossway Books, 1993, 214 pages). Written for the believer, it actually consists of a chapter for each of the Ten Commandments--each a "Discipline of Grace." On page 22 he states:

I am convinced that for the Christian, the understanding of God's Ten Words, the Decalogue, coupled with a determination to live them out by God's Spirit, will invite God's grace and will free His children to soar above the ignorance, moral relativism, and ethical desolation of our culture.

Our critique of this book is the Polemic Paper titled Pauline Grace Versus Covenant Law (Jan. '94), and consists of an Open Letter to Dr. Hughes--to which he did not respond.

Back now to Dr. Packer, the law-leader of them all, and his book Rediscovering Holiness, where he erroneously speaks, among other things, of adoption:

Adoption -- As a purpose of raising sinners from spiritual destitution to the dignity of forgiveness and restoration, acceptance and adoption into God's family, it was costly--not to us, but to God Himself (p. 74).

We know ourselves to be justified through faith in Christ, adopted into God's royal family (p. 94).

The law-blinded are so enamored of the legal that they would fain choose it every time over pure grace. "Oh, how love I Thy law! It is my meditation all the day" is one of their most quoted texts (Ps. 119:97). They tend to enter into a love relationship with the law to the point of an illegal, legal marriage.

A positionally established, Christ-centered believer knows that he was born into the family of God, recreated in Christ Jesus in an eternal union of life and nature--His life and nature. "Christ, who is our life" (Col. 3:4). He is a living member of Christ's Bride-to-be, and although he loves God's "holy, and just, and good" law, he, having died to it, cannot enter into any type of relationship with it.

When the believer experiences his full redemption, including his redeemed and glorious body at the Rapture, he will realize his full legal standing as an adult son before the Father. But he always has been a Blood-bought, life-related child of God since the moment he was re-created in Christ Jesus, by grace alone.

"And not only they, but ourselves also, who have the first-fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, that is, the redemption of our body" (Rom. 8:23).

Adoption into a family is "a legal action by which one takes into his own family a child not his own, and usually of no kin to him, with the purpose of treating him as, and giving him all the privileges of, his own son." A far, far cry from being born into a family!

One-Naturism --The erroneous teaching that the believer possesses but one nature has its source in Covenant theology, hence it would naturally be the teaching of Dr. Packer:

A widespread but misleading line of teaching tells us that Christians have two natures: an old man and a new man. They must obey the latter while denying the former. To envision two "natures," two distinct sets of desires, neither of which masters me till I choose to let it, is unreal and bewildering (p. 38).

Dr. Packer's conception of the scriptural two natures is unreal and bewildering in its own right. Not realizing that death amounts to separation, not annihilation, one-naturists consider the old crucified nature to have been eradicated, now extinct. Hence they look for change in their remaining nature:

Christians do not know themselves well enough to realize that, because of the way in which their nature has been changed, their hearts are now set against all known sin. So they hang on to unscriptural and morally mushy behavior patterns (p. 85).

Typically, the author describes the activity of what is actually the indwelling old Adamic life and nature, as behavior patterns learned in pre-conversion days.

Habits -- Unaware of the exchanged life, the life of Christ within, which functions by its essence, according to its nature, Dr. Packer and associates seek to develop new good habits in order to overcome the old bad habits:

Holiness means, among other things, forming good habits, breaking bad habits, resisting temptation to sin, and controlling yourself when provoked. No one ever managed to do any of these things without effort and conflict.

How do we form Christ-like habits which Paul calls the fruit of the Spirit? By setting ourselves, deliberately, to do the Christ-like things in each situation. "Sow an act, reap a habit; sow a habit, reap a character" (p. 174).

Think of the spiritual blindness and ignorance, to consider the fruit of the Spirit of Christ to consist of habits! Not to mention the sad humanistic behaviorism of trying to produce character by developing habits!

What are my temperamental weaknesses? If I am to be holy, as I am called to be, I must identify them (that is the hard part) and ask the Lord to enable me to form habits of rising above them (p. 26).

Killing Sin! -- Those who are blind to the finished work of the Cross upon which to reckon, find that their only recourse is to try to do away with sin in hand-to-hand battle and struggle:

The Puritans, following Calvin, analyzed holiness as the mortifying of sin (killing it in all its forms) and the vivifying of graces (strengthening holy habits) (p. 172).

How do we "by the Spirit"... put to death the misdeeds of the body" (Rom. 8:13)? It is a matter of negating, wishing dead, and laboring to thwart, inclinations, cravings, and habits that have been with you for a long time. Pain and grief, moans and groans, will certainly be involved, for your sin does not want to die, nor will it enjoy the killing process. It is the Spirit who imparts the strength for which we pray, and who actually draws the life out of the sin we starve (p. 175).

You will probably never encounter a more pathetic paragraph concerning the Christian and sin, than the above. Dr. Packer would pray that the Holy Spirit may impart strength to him for "negating," "wishing dead," and "laboring to thwart," sin.

Repentance --And it doesn't get any better. Blindness never does. Instead of reckoning upon the fact of what God has accomplished at Calvary, Dr. Packer's method is to repent of sin, after the fact:

Repentance means altering one's habits of thought, one's attitudes, outlook, policy, direction, and behavior, just as fully as is needed to get one's life out of the wrong shape and into the right one (p. 183).

The only way to show respect for God's real purity is by realistically setting oneself against sin. That means not only a wholehearted purpose of pleasing God by consecrated zeal in keeping his law, it also means repentance (p. 146).

Holiness -- We mercifully close this chronicle of blind reasoning and effort with Dr. Packer's summation of the holiness which he is in futility seeking to rediscover:

Holiness is a matter of both action and motivation, conduct and character, divine grace and human effort, obedience and creativity, submission and initiative, consecration to God and commitment to people, self-discipline and self-giving, righteousness and love.

It is a matter of Spirit-led law-keeping, a walk, or course of life, in the Spirit that displays the fruit of the Spirit (Christlikeness of attitude and disposition) . It is a matter of seeking to imitate Jesus' way of behaving, through dependence on Jesus for deliverance from carnal self-absorption and for discernment of spiritual needs and possibilities (p. 32).

The only hope for these blinded ones is that the law will bring them all the way down to Romans 7:25: "I thank God through Jesus Christ"--the One who is their very Christian life. The Lord Jesus Christ is the Light of life; the Law is the darkness of death.

The one thing the law-blinded need is light.   If they can look away from the law long enough to see the light in its Source, via the Word, all will be well.

"Ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a people of His own, that ye should show forth the praises of Him who hath called you out of darkness into His marvelous light.  "For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shone in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ"  (1 Peter 2:9; 2 Cor. 4:6).


Strange Contradictory Statements

Over the past decades, James. I. Packer has proven himself rather chameleon-like.  Consider the fact that in 1957, he helped produce a translation of Martin Luther's The Bondage of the Will, Fleming H. Revell Company, and co-authored with O.R. Johnston the book's excellent, 61 page Historical and Theological Introduction.  This work stunningly explained the quintessential gulf between the Reformation and Roman Catholicism, focusing on the sovereignty of God, the Fall, determinism versus indeterminism, etc.

In 1995, nearly 40 years later, he is a leading contributor to the ecumenical publication, Evangelicals & Catholics Together (ECT), Word Publishing, and makes this outrageous statement:

The most poignant expressions of these criticisms [regarding ECT and efforts to blur historical differences] come from middle-age and elderly individuals who found Christ and spiritual life in evangelicalism after failing to find either in the Roman Catholicism of their birth and who cannot believe that Protestants who back ECT know what they are doing.

Forty years ago according to Mr. Packer, the Lord Jesus Christ sovereignly found individuals...and even, contrary to his fellow travelers, outside the Roman Catholic system!  But now he embraces a humanistic view (Arminianism) and shifts culpability from heretical Catholicism to those whom the Lord rescued out of spiritual darkness.  A very low, and nasty blow indeed!  No, nearly 30 years ago, without a priest or sacrament, positive self-image, or elevated state of consciousness; the Lord found me and I was born-again as a new-creation Christian.      DRS


MJStanford

Home | MJS | Hungry Heart Devotional | Testimony | Memorial | Order Books | Email

Best viewed in Explorer 6+ or Netscape 6+, 1024x768 screen display, 16 bit color or higher, and JavaScript on

900MB (2,000+ pages of text)          Copyright © 1996-2008 withChrist.org         Last updated:  January 01, 2008

(Materials by Miles J. Stanford are republished here under exclusive permission from the author.)